Which is true about lincoln steffens
The Shame of the Cities by Lincoln SteffensThis work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
To Stop an Endless Cycle of Corruption, History Says Fix the System, Not the Politician
Lincoln Joseph Steffens April 6, — August 9, was an American investigative journalist and one of the leading muckrakers of the Progressive Era in the early 20th century. Louis ,  that would later be published together in a book titled The Shame of the Cities. He is remembered for investigating corruption in municipal government in American cities and leftist values. He was largely raised in Sacramento , the state capital; the Steffens family mansion, a Victorian house on H Street bought from merchant Albert Gallatin in , would become the California Governor's Mansion in He later became an editor of McClure's magazine, where he became part of a celebrated muckraking trio with Ida Tarbell and Ray Stannard Baker. In The Shame of the Cities , Steffens sought to bring about political reform in urban America by appealing to the emotions of Americans.
Voters are in a bad mood. And we are all bracing for another anger-pageant that will stomp through American life for the next 13 months until election day. A forgotten moment in our history suggests that the way out of a bad political mood is not more rage, but a new political perspective. It was too easy, the muckraker Lincoln Steffens began to argue, to believe that bad politicians were just immoral people. Instead he asked his massive readership to look at the structure rather than the individual, to think about the warped systems that enabled political corruption, and to consider the ways angry voters inadvertently encouraged behavior they condemned. Steffens was the perfect man for the job. The young writer had bounced from California to Europe to Manhattan, driven by wanderlust, contrarianism and a preference for the sleazy over the respectable.
The family moved to Sacramento. At the University of California he developed radical political views. It has been done; not often, but the fact that a proportion, however small, of college students do get a start in interested, methodical study, proves my thesis My method might lose a boy his degree, but a degree is not worth so much as the capacity and the drive to learn My method was hit on by accident and some instinct. I specialized.
He was a confidant to presidents, a mentor to two of the most influential journalists in American history, a friend to industrialists, artists, ward heelers, Communists and bohemians. He saw through all pretenses, circumventions and lies — even the ones he told himself — until in the end he was hornswoggled by the biggest lie of all.
3 billboards what is it about