Human genome project disproves evolution

5.83  ·  1,082 ratings  ·  680 reviews
human genome project disproves evolution

Relics of Eden: The Powerful Evidence of Evolution in Human DNA by Daniel J. Fairbanks

Since the publication in 1859 of Darwin’s Origin of Species, debate over the theory of evolution has been continuous and often impassioned. In recent years, opponents of Darwin’s dangerous idea have mounted history’s most sophisticated and generously funded attack, claiming that evolution is a theory in crisis. Ironically, these claims are being made at a time when the explosion of information from genome projects has revealed the most compelling and overwhelming evidence of evolution ever discovered. Much of the latest evidence of human evolution comes not from our genes, but from so-called junk DNA, leftover relics of our evolutionary history that make up the vast majority of our DNA.
Relics of Eden explores this powerful DNA-based evidence of human evolution. The relics are the millions of functionally useless but scientifically informative remnants of our evolutionary ancestry trapped in the DNA of every person on the planet. For example, the analysis of the chimpanzee and Rhesus monkey genomes shows indisputable evidence of the human evolutionary relationship with other primates. Over 95 percent of our genome is identical with that of chimpanzees and we also have a good deal in common with other animal species.
Author Daniel J. Fairbanks also discusses what DNA analysis reveals about where humans originated. The diversity of DNA sequences repeatedly confirms the archeological evidence that humans originated in sub-Saharan Africa (the Eden of the title) and from there migrated through the Middle East and Asia to Europe, Australia, and the Americas. In conclusion, Fairbanks confronts the supposed dichotomy between evolution and religion, arguing that both science and religion are complementary ways to seek truth. He appeals to the vast majority of Americans who hold religious convictions not to be fooled by the pseudoscience of Creationists and Intelligent Design advocates and to abandon the false dichotomy between religion and real science.
This concise, very readable presentation of recent genetic research is completely accessible to the nonspecialist and makes for enlightening and fascinating reading.
File Name: human genome project disproves
Size: 69846 Kb
Published 30.11.2018

DNA Science - Human Race and Genetics Documentary

Scientific American recently reported on what has transpired since the completion of the Human Genome Project ten years ago. When the HGP.
Daniel J. Fairbanks

What would Darwin have made of the Human Genome Project?

Y ou are the current owner of one of the great wonders of the natural world: a large genome, copied almost perfectly from your parents to you, without which you would not be here. And when I say large, I mean large - 3,,, large to be more accurate. This, give or take a bit, is the size of your genome measured in the number of nucleotides, the Lego-like building blocks of DNA. Buried somewhere in this DNA are genes that code for proteins, about 25, of them, spread out over your 23 chromosomes. Darwin knew nothing of genes, let alone genomes. He knew that children resemble their parents, but other than this his understanding of genetics was, shall we say, limited. What then would he have made of the Human Genome Project?

Recommended for you

Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past

B arely a week goes by without some dispiriting tale of racism seeping into the public consciousness: the endless stream of Ukip supporters expressing some ill-conceived and unimaginative hate; football hooligans pushing a black man from a train. I am partly of Indian descent, a bit swarthy, and my first experience of racism was more baffling than upsetting. Fame was the big hit on telly at the time, and they were the lead characters. My sister and I thought this was excellent: both amazing dancers and supremely attractive: we did bad splits all the way home. Contemporary use of language must be taken into account. Darwin was not a racist. He was a staunch abolitionist, impressed and influenced by his friend and taxidermy tutor John Edmonstone at Edinburgh, who was a freed black slave.

September 11, Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, first published in , offered a bold new explanation for how animals and plants diversified and still serves as the foundation underpinning all medical and biological research today. But the theory remains under attack by creationists in various parts of the world, particularly the US, Turkey, Indonesia and the Middle East. Perhaps three of the most powerful ways to test evolution are through comparative genomics , homeobox genes and transitional fossils. Collectively these provide solid evidence for evolution as a robust theory to account for the diversification of all life. So allow me to explore some recent discoveries in these fields. The first organism sequenced for its entire genome — a bacteriophage a bacterial virus — was done in and it wasn't until the first genome of a bacteria was completed.

The Bible describes humans as being created in the image of God—the pinnacle of His creation. In contrast, those who embrace the presupposition of naturalistic origins have put much effort and even monkey business into a propaganda crusade to claim a bestial origin for man. The idea that humans evolved from an ape-like creature was first widely promoted by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in the early s and later by Charles Darwin in his book The Descent of Man —published 12 years after his acclaimed evolutionary treatise On the Origin of Species. Thomas Huxley, a friend of Darwin, also did much to popularize this idea. Since then, the secular scientific community has promulgated the still-hypothetical idea of human evolution as an established fact.


  1. Siolypamart says:

    Does Mapping the Human Genome Prove Evolution? : Christian Courier

  2. Chris A. says:

    Scientific American recently reported on what has transpired since the completion of the Human Genome Project ten years ago.

  3. Rattpergazhi1966 says:

    The idea that humans evolved from an ape-like creature was first to aid the effort compared to those available for the human genome project.

  4. Kerspennabun1971 says:

    For 50 years, evolutionary theory has emphasized the importance of neutral even when there aren't enough data to disprove a neutral-theory null . Even so, only about 1 percent of the human genome actually codes for.

  5. Mamerto C. says:

    Quanta Magazine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *